ever notice that you can make virtually any glob of text sound overly ambiguous and painfully sarcastic by simply putting quotes around certain words? observe…this is a block of text taken from a CNN.com story about martha stewart’s chicken-tossing escapades:
Given her recent woes, Wall Street has not been kind to Stewart, a former stockbroker and current New York Stock Exchange director, even though she has not been charged with any wrongdoing by any authority to this point. With her company and personal image so tightly wrapped together, the price of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia has dropped more than 20 percent.
Stewart’s holdings in her own company have taken nearly a $200 million hit, wiping out more than a quarter of her net worth, according to one estimate.
Though observers believe her company’s fundamentals are strong enough to withstand the current beating, the future of Stewart’s own image appears to depend strongly on the outcome of the situation.
now put on your guilt kilt (note: such a thing does not exist so don’t try putting one on…unless you really want to) and let’s saturate the thing with ambiguity and make it scream sarcasm by simply adding some well-placed quotation marks!
Given her recent “woes”, Wall Street has not been “kind” to “Stewart”, a “former” stockbroker and current New York “Stock Exchange” director, even though “she” has not been charged with any “wrongdoing” by any “authority” to this point. With her “image” so tightly “wrapped” together, the price of Martha Stewart “Living” Omnimedia has dropped more than “20″ percent.
Stewart’s holdings in “her” own company have taken nearly a $200 million hit, “wiping” out more than a “quarter” of her “net worth”, according to one “estimate”.
Though observers “believe” her company’s “fundamentals” are “strong” enough to “withstand” the current beating, the “future” of Stewart’s own “image” appears to “depend” strongly on the outcome of the “situation”.
har har.